Posts filed under Predictions

2009 Predictions

The Three Fates

Here is my attempt for 2009. In 2007, I was fairly certain of my predictions as we were looking at a credit and housing bubble of historic proportions. There was no doubt it had to burst. In 2008, I was less sure but it was pretty clear that straight down was still the direction we were headed.

In January 2009, we look at world of unprecedented turmoil and infinite possibilities so I am far more uncertain than in the past.

However I am not going to let doubt and ignorance keep me from sticking my head out again. When exactly zero dollars are stake, I am a bold man. Please jump in and correct me where I am wrong.

Of course, this is a parlor game and is not investment advice. If you take your macro-economic guidance from the blog of someone for whom domain names constitute a significant asset class, then I respectfully submit that passive index funds might be a better choice for you.

World Economy 1) The consensus Wall Street forecast that the US will have a 2nd half of 2009 recovery is some kind of bad joke. Full year recession in the -2% to -3% range for the US in 2009. I can’t see any recovery before middle 2010 at the earliest and even that is optimistic. There will be weakness for years.

The key issue is that consumers have had massive wealth destruction (stocks, homes) and have to delever (too much debt, negative savings rates). That is going to be a huge drag on consumption for a very long time and why the government is stepping into the breach with unprecedented fiscal stimulus.

Real unemployment will be above 10% for sure but since the current numbers are carefully massaged to exclude large numbers of people that are unemployed by any common sense definition (e.g. they are of working age and do not have a job), that might not be the official figure.

2) Euro-zone growth will be -2% and could be worse. It will be worse in Spain and Ireland for sure.

3) UK growth will be -2% to -3% range and could conceivably be worse. The UK is a basket case; it has all the problems of the US, but more so.

4) China will be in the 5% to 7% range which is basically a recession for them. They can’t absorb their labor force at that rate of growth. The figure could be lower but I suspect they will apply as much fiscal stimulus as they can to avoid that.

5) Eastern Europe (Romania, Hungary, Bulgaria) and the Baltics are going to have a generally tough year. I don’t know enough about their economies to know specifics.

6) Icelanders will consume more herring and fewer Range Rovers in 2009. I am recruiting for volunteers to go collect this year-on-year data since I am not sure we will find it in the back of the WSJ.

Central Banks

1) Fed Reserve will keep rates at or about zero for the year

2) Bank of England and ECB will both end up at or below 100bps by year end, probably by mid-year realistically.

Residential Real Estate

1) Continues to fall in 2009 but at a reduced rate.

2) Still looking at a 30% overall decline (far side of my 2008 predictions), maybe a little bit more.

3) This is the year Manhattan will feel the pain too. 15-20% decline vs. peak in 2007 and more to come in 2010.

Commercial Real Estate

1) This is the year the bottom falls out, particularly in retail and office. I thought it would be last year that this happened but I was early.

2) A large part of the commercial real estate problem in on the credit side where assets where bought at silly prices supported by silly lending supported by silly assumptions on occupancy and rental rates…so lots of folks will default.

3) While there is a capacity problem, it is not the insane overcapacity of the 1980s

4) The CRE folks are asking for a bailout but I can’t figure out why it is an issue of federal importance if X real estate equity investor or the related debt-holders earn the cash flows from any particular building. The building will still be there generating cash flow and housing tenants…

Your Tax-Dollars at Work

1) The government will spend phenomenal amounts of your money on bailing out financial institutions and get little in return. They should just get on with nationalizing the weakest players, write down the assets to realistic levels and then refloat them once the junk has been written down so that people will believe the balance sheets.

2) Instead, they are going through extreme convolutions (TARP, guarantees, ABS guarantees, and on and on) to support inflated asset values and pouring money into the banks that is slipping back out to shareholders, creditors and management.

Painful to watch since it will just be a more expensive way to get to exactly the same place. It is the worst of all worlds: all the costs of nationalization and much less of the cleanup. Many major financial institutions are insolvent not illiquid, so we might as well get on with the clean-up, not drag it out over a decade like Japan did.

3) I have great sympathy for the fact that Paulsen et al had to make very important decisions very fast without a playbook. But a year later, there is still not an intellectually coherent framework of who gets bailed out how much nor any transparency about it.

Given that, you can be assured that much money will be wasted.

4) There will be massive (this is the word of the day!) fiscal stimulus by the Obama administration as long as the world will finance it.

5) Overall, the government has spent or guaranteed a staggering $7T-$8T so far and is going to add a few $T more. If you count the guarantees, we doubled the size of the federal obligations in 1 year.

I think lawmakers have gone numb at this stage. $30B plus $100B of guarantees for BoA raised barely an eyebrow last week. That would have been a huge event a year ago; now, what’s another $xxB to our tab?

6) The USA is in uncharted financial waters in terms of how much it is expanding its obligations on a run-rate basis (historical context: the federal govt had a higher overall debt load after WWII relative to GDP, though the overall country debt load is at record high, relative to GDP).

If the US can maintain the world’s confidence long enough to recapitalize the financial system and stimulate the economy through the upcoming consumer economy, then it is a testament to the remarkable reserve “brand” of the US economy.

But it is in a position where it is vulnerable to its external lenders and if a lender (hint: China) eventually is forced to cut and run, the options get much tougher and painful for the US.

It will either soft-default through devaluation or strangle the economy through higher interest rates (to attract capital) and fiscal restraint.

Dangerous and interesting times, watching financial common sense go against the fact that for the last 100 years, the US economy always somehow recovers faster and stronger.

Currency Under regular circumstances, the fact that the US is printing money left, right and center would be terrible for the dollar and in the long-term we can probably expect the dollar to devalue.

But in the short-to-medium term, I have a hard timing thinking about which currency the dollar would devalue against.

The UK is in worse shape than the US and GBP is not a reserve currency. Large parts of the EMU are in terrible shape and the euro has never been tested in a crisis (will Germany support Club Med in a crunch?). Also, qualitatively on a personal level, the Euro feels overvalued in PPP terms coming from the US. Even the less affluent parts of Europe are expensive in dollar terms for basic items and that does not quite make sense.

1) Dollar will stay stable or strengthen against the Euro. I would expect 1.15 to 1.35 to be the trading range this year

2) China will not let the yuan rise against the dollar nor will it radically devalue. Stable.

3) I have no opinion about the GBP. It has already collapsed against the Euro and fallen hard against the dollar.

Web 2.0 or whatever it is called 1) Lots of silly ‘social’ companies will die this year

2) Lots of entertainment oriented video-viewing companies will die this year, but video is here to stay in a big way online

3) But overall VCs have been more sensible than in ‘97-’01 so it won’t be the vast value destruction of the .com bust.

This time, it is their financial brethren in NY & London who have shown the world what type of value destruction real Masters of the Universe can achieve. The VCs never came close to shutting down the whole global economic and trading system and breaking every single financial market.

4) Good time to invest as competition for deals, market spaces, teams and opportunities is about to go way down. You can actually focus on building a company without a dozen clones a week.

PE

1) As predicted, 2009-2010 will be years of destruction for the companies purchased based on “everything going right forever” valuation models.

Some might drag on longer due to weak covenants but it is not going to be pretty for 2005-2007 vintage investments.

The “it’s all about the velocity of investing” nonsense is hopefully dead and buried.

2) PE will return more to its historical roots in terms of buying solid companies, though for now, re-caps and investing through the debt side appears to be more feasible.

3) How good you feel as a GP in private equity probably has a lot to do with where you are in the fund-raising cycle…some folks are going to really struggle as LPs reduce their allocation to the field.

Probably we are looking a similar situation as the last down-turn where 30-40% of firms will either wind down or become substantially less prominent over the next 5-7 years.

4) In any case, PE heads seem to have suffered from the curse of being declared Masters of the Universe in mainstream publications and lauded, applauded and feared. Like naming a stadium, it is probably the perfect contrarian indicator.

Hedge Funds 1) Good luck to the quants. They got killed in 2008 and I doubt 2009 will be much better. Their models require some predictability in markets and I am not sure they are going to get it this year.

2) Needless to say many hedge funds will fail this year, deservedly so.

The thought that there could be 8,000 to 9,000 funds capable of beating the market on a post-fee, risk-adjusted basis was idiotic. 90% of them probably should go; maybe 50% will.

Investing These are not market timing predictions. Just things that I would consider if I had a portfolio to rebalance:

1) Long dated TIPS seem pretty attractive as they are basically pricing in no inflation forever and inflation will come back eventually given all the liquidity being created. I think this is great protection for someone who is otherwise preparing for a super-recession.

2) Treasuries are overbought. While they won’t collapse this year, there is really no upside from here

3) High grade corporate debt at 500bps+ above Treasuries seems like a good buy if you / your manager is a picker

4) High-Yield at 1500bps above Treasuries is certainly a far better deal than the exact same High-Yield was at 200-300bps above Treasuries 18 months ago.

This would be a risky bet for the bold since many of these companies will fail, but if you are bold, now is the time to buy high yield when you are actually getting paid for the risk.

As with #3, probably good deals here for the person who get deep in the financials. But I have no idea; maybe all these firms will fail.

5) I have no opinion on US equities except that they will be volatile all year. It seems like we could go through a prolonged period of uncertainty, multiple compression, and general distaste with stocks like in the 1970s.

On the other hand, Buffett made one of his very rare market calls and it was a Buy and he is the undisputed master of this domain.

So listen to him, not me. And some more qualitative thoughts

1) Pakistan is the most important battleground in the world right now and the Islamicists are having great success. Islamabad is losing control of the NWFP; Swat is getting overrun and Peshawar is endangered. All of this is happening 100 miles from Islamabad.

2) The West feels like it is at an inflection point. The economic system has failed to a significant degree, there are powerful though immature competitors emerging in Asia, and peoples’ expectations of their future well-being will not be met. The riots in Greece and Latvia are fundamentally about economic opportunity and expectations.

These types of events have lead to political, social and geopolitical re-orderings in the past.

It could happen again or we could muddle through. But there is definitely the possibility for big change in the air, in a way that there hasn’t been since the fall of the Communist bloc.

3) There will be hearings and there will be indictments.

We have only seen the beginning because the crash just happened and we had a pro-Wall Street administration.

I will be very surprised if Washington does not deliver some heads on a stick from Wall Street by 2009-2010. As with the Pujol and Pecora Hearings, Wall Street will be brought to DC and given a good spanking and a few more tomes worth of (re) regulation.

4) The financial services sector will start deflating back to more normal standards as a percentage of economy-wide profit and employment. Slow, cyclical process that will continue until the next mega bubble (10, 15, 20, 30 years?). There will always be swash-buckling financial types making billions throughout the whole period, just like there have been in every period, but the overall industry has to contract substantially and instant deca-millionaires of the past few years will be rarer.

5) The current recession has done wonders for oil prices but does nothing to change the medium-term dynamics that demand is steadily rising while supply is not.

We will still have a crunch in the medium-term. Stock up now while it is cheap! Contango saying the same thing.

6) Ongoing theme from the past: Biotech, nanotech and artificial intelligence will revolutionize society in the next 10-30 years in a way that is hard for most to appreciate, so to some degree, we are still worrying about our horse-drawn carriages when a Ferrari is on the horizon.

I continue to prepare for the day when we will welcome our robot overlords.

7) If you are reading this blog and wondering about how high-yield might trade relative to Treasuries, you are likely already one of the 0.0001% luckiest humans to ever live.

So, don’t forget that and have a very happy and healthy 2009.

Posted on January 19, 2009 and filed under Predictions.

Part II of II: 2008 Predictions

2008 Outlook and Predictions

As I have mentioned, the accuracy of last year’s predictions will be basically impossible to beat as we head into more uncertain times, but here’s my shot for 2008.

The summary answer is 2008 will be a down year.

And of course this is not investment advice and should not be relied up – I am certainly not a broker, nor a dealer, nor an investment advisor nor certified by any relevant authority to tell you what do with your money. (and in fact I usually fail to follow my own advice)

Economy

The 15 year party for the US economy is now over. Given the technology excesses of 1999-2001, the 2001 recession should have been more severe.

As is now well-known, the severity of that recession was mitigated through very loose monetary policy which sparked a housing bubble that directly stimulated the economy and indirectly stimulated consumer spending through the wealth effect and home equity extraction.

This game is now over and with: a tapped out consumer, a tapped out federal budget and a weak dollar preventing massive rate cuts, it is hard to see what can possible drive growth in 2008

1. The US is mostly likely already in recession. Regardless, in 2008, the US will enter a recession of moderate-high severity. Let's call Q1 2008 as the most likely official market of recession.

2. A best case scenario is 3 recessionary quarters. A worst case would be 5 or 6 quarters if housing and recession intertwine in a very negative manner

3. The European Union will slow down as well. Certain parts of Europe, such as the United Kingdom and Spain had housing bubbles larger than that of the United States.

EU growth in 2008 will be lower than 2007. If I had to guess a growth recession for the EU overall with UK and Spain in actual recessions by the 2nd half of 2008.

4. China will not “decouple” from the US. In a recession, growth will slow there as well by at least 3%.

5. Equity markets and risky assets overall are not going to have a good year

6. US interest rates, needless to say, are headed down. There is a 100% chance of a 100bps drop by year-end and a 65% chance of 200bps.

Mortgage / Housing Market

We are, at most, in the 3rd inning of the housing market collapse

1. Last year, I predicted housing prices could fall 20% peak to trough. I stand by that prediction and revise it to be 20 to 25% in real terms with an outside shot at 30%.

2. This is going to be the worst housing crisis in modern financial history and substantially exceed the damage caused by the S&L crisis in terms of total losses. I will come back and quantify later what S&L did.

3. Defaults are still below their peak in subprime and will spread to alt-a, near prime, prime, credit card and other consumer debt. Particularly with the escape hatch of a subprime loan out of the picture for most people, the alternative is going to be defaults.

Prediction: Mortgage default rates peak and plateau in last 2008, early 2009. Credit card will track closely or a little later.

4. Housing prices will trail foreclosures, will fall through 2008 and not bottom out until 2009. I am not comfortable making quarterly predictions but if I had to guess on a bottom, I would say Q3 2009 in real terms.

5. Commercial real estate is about to enter a similar downturn with defaults starting to show up right about now: Q1 and Q2 2008

Financial Markets

By 2006, we were seeing the biggest credit bubble possibly since the 1920s across every asset class, including residential real estate, commercial real estate, corporate bonds, high yield.

This was driven to a large degree by a fragmentation of the financial system that exceeded the pace of appropriate risk management, control and incentive structures.

To take the example of a mortgage, every party in the chain: mortgage broker, mortgage appraiser, mortgage originator, mortgage securitizer (and re-securitizer into CDOs, etc), credit rating agencies and even ultimate hedge fund investor either have completely non-aligned (fee-based) or asymmetrical (performance fee based) incentives.

Sparked by low nominal rates and the classic early phases of a bubble, this system spiraled out of control.

The results are evident in the last 6 months of mind-boggling write-downs at our major financial institutions that look like they will total > $100B this first phase alone. This is a complete repudiation of the “we have to be in this business/at these terms/etc to be competitive/maintain market share/etc” or other related stupidity.

These words should strike terror in the hearts of any rational, economically driven shareholder. The net result of all of this is that existing shareholders are getting diluted out to the Gulf states, Singapore and China.

There is no doubt in mind that the writedowns at most firms will far exceed the fee income they generated during corresponding time period. Note: the bonuses for executives from the go-go days will not be clawed back of course which tells you all you need to know.

1. This phase of write-downs is almost complete. There will be another series of confessionals this week (Jan 14th) and then I think we will be quiet for a whole.

2. The next large phase of write-downs will occur in second half of 2008 when mortgage holders actually start defaulting and later (late 2008 to mid 2009?) when high yield starts to feel pain and all consumer credit categories suffer

3. When all is said and done (2009), I am going to put the total credit market losses (mortgage, commercial real estate, credit card, high yield, CDS) at above $800B

4. We will have substantial credit contraction as banks protect their balance sheet and off-balance sheet structures evaporate. I am not in a position to guess the magnitude but it will be meaningful.

Private Equity/High Yield

1. I am holding to last year’s predictions that we will start to see the first losses in high-yield backed CDOs in 2008, though the worst of it won’t show up until 2009-2010

2. PE Fund vintages invested too late (2006 to early 2007?) to do the fast dividend recap before the credit market closed are going to be hurt. At some point you have to sell and with credit spreads back at historical norms, buyers can’t bid the companies up the same way. Most likely response by PE firms will be to wait it all out, but that means, at best, mean longer holder periods, anemic growth and lower IRRs.

Most deals done in late 05 to early 07 did not bake in much tolerance for a recession…

3. More generally, in 2008 we will start seeing the first corporate defaults. High yield has had unnaturally low defaults not through underwriting genius but due to the fact that companies could refinance out of trouble (just like homeowners).

That window is closed. Expect something closer to historical default rates in 2008 and above historical default rates in 2009

4. Last year, I told a friend that we are going to have an iconic PE blow-up in this cycle and guessed it would be a deal that badly violated the traditional parameters of where PE makes sense: Sallie Mae, Chrysler or third deal that I can’t remember (maybe TXU).

Sallie Mae escaped just in time by not concluding the deal otherwise it would have been the star disaster show, though the mega-breakup fee-to-be will for the record books I think in PE.

In the meantime we can get to watch great business drama with Chrysler to see if Cerberus can find a way forward there. From some parties’ perspective this is already a mess since the investment banks are still sitting on $10B of loans they have not placed…

5. Go long distressed funds in 2009! (if you have access to them)

Currency

1. GBP will weaken. The GBP:US will drop to at least 1.8 over the course of the year

2. Dollar-Euro will spend the year primarily in the 1.40 to 1.60 range. Yes, the dollar is weak and will weaken but the Euro-zone is not as strong as it looks.

Online

1. By Q3-Q4 2008, we will have a mini internet bust. The internet is now a permanent part of the economic structure and will continue to take disproportionate share of growth over the next 10 years.

But there are quite a few companies being funded recently at levels that don’t make much sense to me.

Still, this bust will be nothing like that bust of 2001 as the amounts at play are much smaller ($2M to $10M rounds).

2. Most online video startups will fail particularly badly. The economics of general, entertainment or user-generated online video are not very good. Generic advertising dollars at a $10CPM are just covering bandwidth costs and partial content generation costs, let alone SGA or profits. It is going to be almost impossible to make a destination video site, particularly with original content, successful from scratch. I will give a detailed analysis of the economics of online video in a different posting

I don’t know how to quantify this prediction since most startups fail, so I will have to take a raincheck on quantification.

Disclaimer: we are invested in online.tv which has a very large collection of .tv domains on which we hope that we or others will build online video businesses so this post might be dismissed as competitive sniping!

That’s all for now. I think generally will be a bad year in 2008 from a financial [long] perspective, but that does not matter all that much. You need some downturns to make the upswings fun.

Have a great 2008!

Posted on January 14, 2008 and filed under Predictions.

Part I of II: Review of 2007 Predictions

As highly distinguished (time to kiss up to my 2 readers!) regular followers of this blog know this has been my year of attempting to humiliate myself via public predictions. I figured this is the only way for me to counter my tendency to think I am always right through the amazing trick called selective memory. In Part I, we review the last year's predictions. In Part II, we will do 2008 predictions.

Overall Q3/Q4 2006 and Q1 2007 is when my close friends would take me out to drinks hoping for a pleasant evening and instead get to watch me gesticulate wildly about "subprime", "no-doc loans", and credit spreads. I got around to committing thoughts to blog in March 2007, but these predictions were little different from what I was babbling about in Dec 2006. In any case, in the last 9-12 months, we have had the pleasure of watching the following unfold:

housing always goes up -> what's subprime? -> it is not that big a deal -> it is contained to subprime -> what is Alt-A? -> it is contained to subprime and Alt-A -> It won't affect prime -> It won't affect the housing market -> it won't affect the housing market that much, -> it won't affect the economy -> it won't affect the economy that much -> there won't be a recession -> there won't be a severe recession (that is where we stand today).

Literally thousands of extremely smart and highly paid people from investment banks, investment firms, the Federal reserve, academia and the media seemed absolutely incapable of thinking more than one step ahead at a time. They could only envision an incremental change from today's conventional wisdom. Strange.

Economist of the Year has to go to Nouriel Roubini who has been basically right every time he opened his mouth this year.

In any case, below, I go through each prediction and note how I think I did. The original post can be verified here.

Overall, this year's grade was an A- on prediction and an F- on implementation.

I was as right as I am ever going to be on predicting anything and to the best of my knowledge I did not enter into any financial transactions where financial benefits accrued to me due to that knowledge. In fact, I did not even get around to hedging Global Learning Semester's euro exposure so basically I lost one of our companies money by ignoring my own public advice.

There is certainly something to be learned from my F-, but I am not sure I would like to know what it is (!)

So this year's rewards will just have to be psychological in nature.

------------

1. Subprime underwriting bubble and drop in underwriting standards exposed as unsustainable.

100% correct

2. Complex distribution of risk in subprime mortgages through financial instruments like CDOs does very little to protect against stupid credit / underwriting risks. The thought that slicing and dicing the risk makes it somehow less risky is false.

100% correct, instead this "innovation" made it more risky because it has added counterparty risk everywhere and placed illiquidity in the hands of parties that don't have access to the Fed.

3. Stand-alone subprime mortgage originators have a 1998-style industry shake-out with tremendous drops in valuation and bankruptcies.

100% correct. Almost every standalone subprime originator is now out of business in one way or another.

1. Subprime MBS continue to underperform through 2007 and Q2 2008. We have not seen the worst of things yet.

So far, so good

2. Alt-A MBS underperform from now Q2 2007 to late 2008. The concept that this is an issue contained to subprime is put to rest by the end of Q3 2007. Keep an eye on Indy Mac as a bellweather.

100% right. IndyMac is down 83% since I made this prediction. Boo on me for not shorting.

3. Housing prices fall by 20%+ in certain regions as the appraisal cycle starts to work in reverse. In other words, lower appraised values push more homeowners into low/no equity situations, leading to more foreclosures, lower sales prices and lower appraised values. Values start falling in 2007 through mid 2008.

Right on track. According to Schiller, housing prices are down 10% in real terms and still falling.

4. Investment banking investments in subprime origination platforms in 2006 turn out to have been terrible investments at the peak of the market. Note this has already happened, it is just not fully disclosed yet.

100% correct. See Merrill Lynch and First Franklin for the best example of this. There are no counterexamples.

B. Buyouts

1. Multiple LBO funds IPO in 2007 after Blackstone. Let's say at least 3 in total but no more than 6.

Missed this one. The window closed faster than I expected.

2. High-yield credit tightens from late 07 to late 08. Spreads and covenants start to return to historical norms.

Was a little late on this by 1Q, but basically correct.

3. First higher-than-expected losses to the junior (CDO) tranches of high-yield issuances in 2008.

Remains to be seen...

4. More regulatory pressure by 2008, either regarding tax rates or fees earned by the senior MDs, particularly of the publicly traded vehicles.

5. At least one very visible PE-backed company blow-up from Q2 08 to Q2 09.

Remains to be seen. We have certainly seen deals blow up, but that is not the same thing.

6. 2008-2010 are tougher years for the PE industry as a) ability to lever deteriorates, b) revenue growth at companies slows, c) public markets are less accomodating to leveraged IPOs, d) competition for deals does not ease. Holding times increase and more time is spent on operations.

Remains to be seen, but all trends are pointing in this direction.

7. Overall, 2006-2007 vintage funds underperform. 2009-2010 vintage funds perform well as markets and valuations correct or over-correct. I have no opinion about 2008 vintage.

2007-2008 vintage distressed debt funds do well also.

#7 is a long-range prediction so if I am off by a year, I am still claiming victory!

Remains to be seen...

C. Overall:

1. Economy weakens substantially in 2008 into a growth recession or actual recession. I am less sure of this than of my other predictions but think it is more likely than not. If this happens at the wrong time relative to the coming housing/mortgage bust, it severely aggravates issues in housing and the two cycles self-reinforce.

This is almost certainly now going to happen

2. Dollar crosses 1.40 against the Euro at some point in 07/08.

Yes, I was too optimistic as it actually touched 1.50. Another failure to profit! :)

3. All forms of credit tighten by late 2007 to mid 2008 and yield spreads start to return to historical norms

Yes. Again, I was off by 1Q

4. New President in Q4 2008 inherits a weak and vulnerable economy.

Remains to be seen, but there is no way this will not be the case...

Posted on January 7, 2008 and filed under Predictions.

Predictions 2007-2008

Nostradamus

Background My rule of thumb is that I have about 1 good macro-level idea per year.

I tend to think that my predictive accuracy is pretty good, but it is also possible that there is some historical revisionism happening where I remember my correct predictions and forget my incorrect predictions. In fact all research into human psychology suggests that would be the expected case.

I have sometimes been too early in my prior predictions which makes it very fortunate that I did not had enough capital to short dot coms in 1999! “The market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.” (Keynes) is one of the wisest statements in investing.

The Test So the only way to test if these predictions are accurate is to write them down, preferably publicly, so here they are.

Comments, contributions and your own predictions are very welcome! I will put a permanent link on the right hand side so we can find this post and review how we do.

This post will be updated at least once a quarter, if not more often, but new entries will be time-stamped.

This is the first post, at end of Q1 2007.

This by no means should be construed as investment advice

PREDICTIONS COMPLETE SO FAR

1. Subprime underwriting bubble and drop in underwriting standards exposed as unsustainable.

STATUS: Correct. March 2007. This one is complete

2. Complex distribution of risk in subprime mortgages through financial instruments like CDOs does very little to protect against stupid credit / underwriting risks. The thought that slicing and dicing the risk makes it somehow less risky is false.

STATUS: Correct. March 2007. This one is complete

3. Stand-alone subprime mortgage originators have a 1998-style industry shake-out with tremendous drops in valuation and bankruptcies.

STATUS: Correct. March 2007. This one is complete

Now in subprime I was a bit advantaged because I have been following the space since just before the 1998 credit crunch and subsequent collapse of most subprime originators. We'll see about broader trends...

PREDICTIONS STILL OUTSTANDING

A. Mortgage

1. Subprime MBS continue to underperform through 2007 and Q2 2008. We have not seen the worst of things yet.

2. Alt-A MBS underperform from now Q2 2007 to late 2008. The concept that this is an issue contained to subprime is put to rest by the end of Q3 2007. Keep an eye on Indy Mac as a bellweather.

3. Housing prices fall by 20%+ in certain regions as the appraisal cycle starts to work in reverse. In other words, lower appraised values push more homeowners into low/no equity situations, leading to more foreclosures, lower sales prices and lower appraised values. Values start falling in 2007 through mid 2008.

4. Investment banking investments in subprime origination platforms in 2006 turn out to have been terrible investments at the peak of the market. Note this has already happened, it is just not fully disclosed yet.

B. Buyouts

1. Multiple LBO funds IPO in 2007 after Blackstone. Let's say at least 3 in total but no more than 6.

2. High-yield credit tightens from late 07 to late 08. Spreads and covenants start to return to historical norms.

3. First higher-than-expected losses to the junior (CDO) tranches of high-yield issuances in 2008.

4. More regulatory pressure by 2008, either regarding tax rates or fees earned by the senior MDs, particularly of the publicly traded vehicles.

5. At least one very visible PE-backed company blow-up from Q2 08 to Q2 09.

6. 2008-2010 are tougher years for the PE industry as a) ability to lever deteriorates, b) revenue growth at companies slows, c) public markets are less accomodating to leveraged IPOs, d) competition for deals does not ease. Holding times increase and more time is spent on operations.

7. Overall, 2006-2007 vintage funds underperform. 2009-2010 vintage funds perform well as markets and valuations correct or over-correct. I have no opinion about 2008 vintage.

2007-2008 vintage distressed debt funds do well also.

#7 is a long-range prediction so if I am off by a year, I am still claiming victory!

C. Overall:

1. Economy weakens substantially in 2008 into a growth recession or actual recession. I am less sure of this than of my other predictions but think it is more likely than not. If this happens at the wrong time relative to the coming housing/mortgage bust, it severely aggravates issues in housing and the two cycles self-reinforce.

2. Dollar crosses 1.40 against the Euro at some point in 07/08.

3. All forms of credit tighten by late 2007 to mid 2008 and yield spreads start to return to historical norms

4. New President in Q4 2008 inherits a weak and vulnerable economy.

Once again:

This by no means should be construed as investment advice

Posted on March 31, 2007 and filed under Predictions.