Football, Greece & the Euro

So two big items this weekend:   The Greek match against Russia where Russia was heavily favored to wipe them out of the Euro 2012 and the now, infamous Greek elections - v2.

Greece somehow channeled the Greece of 2004 and won 1-0

http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2012/jun/16/euro-2012-greece-russia-live

This was the setup from the Guardian

Good evening. It has been said on more than one occasion this week that the moment of truth for Greece is fast approaching. This viewpoint has generally been carried in the so-called "serious pages" and relates to what is believed to be the more important matter of the re-run of the Greek general election. But the fact of the matter is that twice in the next 24 hours the Greeks will put their necks on the line with a place in the Euros at stake.

Escaping the pincer jaws of austerity may be slightly harder than grinding out a 1-0 win over a Russia side who, for the most part, have impressed in this tournament, but there is no outcome in Sunday's election that will lift the spirits of the people quite like victory in Warsaw.

The signs don't look good for Greece. A quick pilfering of the work of the good folks at Opta reveals that they have had the fewest shots on goal of any team in Euro 2012 so far (three) and they have only won one of their 11 group stage games the European Championships – that was the opening match of their triumphant 2004 campaign against Portugal. In fact this is the third successive European Championships that Greece have played Russia and they have lost the previous two. But win they must – it's as simple as that.

And the outcome, again from the Guardian

Full Time: Greece 1-0 Russia. Greece go through to the last eight. Russia are out. That is astonishing. Truly astonishing.

They played like the 2004 team - the most improbable winner of any major football tournament ever...

http://www.zonalmarking.net/2010/03/29/greece-euro-2004-tactics/

This Greek side achieved perhaps the most astonishing thing in the history of international football. There have been one-off shocks, games that went against the favourites because of a particular set of circumstances. USA 1-0 England in 1950. Senegal 1-0 France in 2002. But those things can happen; shocks in football happen because it’s such a low-scoring game, and dominance doesn’t always equal goals.

But never before has a team so unfancied gone onto win a major international tournament. Available at odds of up to 250/1 and having never won a tournament game in their history, Greece’s march to wining Euro 2004 was unquestionably the tactical achievement of the decade. 

And, for ultimate irony, their likely opponent in the quarterfinals will be Germany.

This will definitely lighten the mood in Greece for tonight -- I wonder if it will actually impact election results

 

Posted on June 16, 2012 and filed under Greece.

Our Super Bowl Ad for Global Learning Semesters

Screenshot from Global Learning Semesters Super Bowl Ad

Well, yes, we have finally done it. We have gone and bought a $3M Super Bowl ad for Global Learning Semesters, to promote our programs to 90M people, along with Coca-Cola, Doritos, E-Trade, Budweiser and Ford.

Well, not exactly, but our Paris program did appear in first seven seconds of the Google Super Bowl ad in the third quarter of the Super Bowl.

You can watch the ad on YouTube.

Posted on February 7, 2010 and filed under Education.

Google, On2, HTML5

The typically obscure and technical world of back-end online video processing is having its day in the press today as Google just bought ON2, the makers of the 'VP' line of codecs, one of the two leading encoding standards for web video (H.264 is the other). I realize I have already lost 90% of the audience which is why 'video encoding' is something that belongs in the back-room with the techies. Dan Frommer at Alley Insider is excited about the acquisition.

Dan Rayburn, on the other hand, thinks this is no big deal, because, after all this is just a codec and H.264 is quite well embedded in a lot of sites and devices, so a small drop in royalties or a small improvement in quality by open-sourcing VP8 is not going to drive any real adoption.

Dan R is right on all the short-term implications, but I think there is a bigger, longer-term strategic angle here.

My guess is that Google bought On2 to support new HTML 5 standard. HTML 5 has the ability to natively support video in the browser without having a plug-in like Flash or Silverlight. In the long-term, this is a good thing for the web, but obviously Microsoft (with Silverlight) and Adobe (with Flash) don't love it.

HTML 5 video right now is hindered by the fact that the default open-source video codec (Theora) is, quite frankly, lousy. It is based on VP3, an old ON2 technology that was contributed to the open-source community and is not up to par with modern codecs like VP8 or H.264.

I suspect what you will see is that Google open-sources VP8, not because this will get them an awesome controlling platform but because it will support HTML 5 video and *weaken* Microsoft's or Adobe's ability to be a platform for video.

If you parse this sentence from their announcement they are all but telegraphing this.

Because we spend a lot of time working to make the overall web experience better for users, we think that video compression technology should be a part of the web platform.

At VideoPublishing.com, we think this is overall good news. Over time, encoding and delivery will eventually fade into the background and innovation will be about managing workflow and interactivity with video, because that, ultimately is the promise of web video.

UPDATE: Some good follow-on comments by Tim Siglin here:

Posted on August 5, 2009 and filed under Online Media.

Real-time

I am watching the #iranelection stream at http://search.twitter.com. It is mesmerizing - the #iranelection stream is updating at more than 1 tweet per second right now.

Of course, it is messy, sloppy, repetitive, rumors mixed in with facts, a lot of retweets and it needs better authority, curation and editing tools, but still…

It is like a window into the future has opened. This one of those special moments in technology from which you realize there is no coming back.

If the Iranian protests succeed, Twitter will have been to Iran what fax machines were to Eastern Europe.

The stream is pouring out everything from news, to links to videos, to messages of support, to advice on how to, say, disable a Soviet-era tank or which embassies are or are not taking the injured.

It makes Google News look vulnerable to The Daily Show's question to the NY Times about "Why is 'aged' news is better than real news?".

Google News can’t be any faster than CNN, BBC, NY Times et al and it does not matter how good those organizations are, no individual organization can keep up with this type of mass-produced content.

It is why Larry Page said Google needs sub-second indexing; it is what Borthwick expressed very elegantly about real-time here.

I did not understand real-time a year ago; I understood it intellectually, maybe three months ago (but even then you think: do I really need Techcrunch or even Flight 1549 in "real-time"?)

But watching #iranelection tonight there can be little doubt about the direction in which distribution is irrevocably headed.

Posted on June 20, 2009 and filed under Online Media.